The Earth before the Flood: Disappeared continents and civilizations


Go to content

Main menu:


Moon - a fragment of Hyperborea

Fragments from the books

Click images!

Some years ago an ironical notice in some material about Hyperborea that it was searched everywhere except as on Moon had caught my eye. It has appeared prophetical....

The strange thing - destiny. Sometimes she plays with us malicious jokes, and at times gives such surprises that the heart with joy is ready to jump out of the chest. Here and with me there was something similar.
I ha
d finished the chapter about separation of Moon from the Earth (the book " Battles of ancient gods") and had gone to look a film about Moon, to rest a little . And fancy my agitation when less than in a half an hour I had heard that the hypothesis just stated by me received all new and new confirmations. The main from them - equal age of the Earth and Moon (approximately 4,5 billion years), presence on Moon the same rocks, as on the Earth, and availability on Moon typical earthly elements of relief - mountain ridge and gorges (canyons).
Further - it is more.
Having viewed news on Internet, I had seen a large quantity of pages telling about ostensibly classified as secret by NASA photos of ruins of an ancient city on Moon, and then photos itself had also appeared to my look.
All it was so interesting that I had decided in more details to rummage in materials on geology of Moon. And the time expended on it had not gone to waste. The works of scientists of Planetary Science Institute (NASA, the USA) and Brown's University (Brown University, the USA) under the direction of professor Peter H.Schults had caught my eye.

They concentrated their investigations on lunar mounts of volcanic origin in Ina area about 3 km in length and had established … that these mounts were formed from 1 to 10 million years ago. Professor Schultz and his staff assured that four more similar zones had been discovered on a lunar surface at least.
It was too much. All was so good fitted into just stated hypothesis, or, if to be more exact, into the legend about churning of ocean that I was ready to believe in infallibility of all of about what I ha
d written in the articles. But, fortunately, had changed my mind in time.
After all, for certain, and equal age and composition of lunar and earthly rocks, and presence on Moon elements of relief similar to the Earth, and discovery of an ancient city on it different explorers will interpret variously. For certain, many of them will discover in it
the participation of alien reason. Though, for what reason, on Moon? On the dead, lifeless planet?
Well here, now, apparently, had come the time to tell you about what thoughts rolled in my head still before I had switched on the TV set.
Found out on Moon by Soviet and American automatic stations and astronauts rocks having age 4-4,5 billion years, similar on composition to Earth's basalts, and thickness of the lunar crust (60-100 km), comparable to thickness of ancient continental platforms on the Earth, speak about the following. If Moon was really a part of the Earth, it belonged to an ancient continental platform. The legend about charning of ocean strictly localises a
position of this platform by the northern polar latitudes. But earlier there was Hyperborea here populated being on the highest level of development adityas and gandharvas with apsaras!
Means, the presence on Moon "ruins of cities, huge spheric objects from glass" and even "stone towers and castles which hover in the air" is not groundless. All it can be miraculously remained on the satellite of the Earth surface the remains of ancient legendary Hyperborea!
Especially strike imagination the objects from "glass", ostensibly found out on Moon. After all, you, probably, have not fogotten yet the legend about Inis Vitrin or Glass island in the North - the stronghold of the mysterious
civilisation of fomorians. Probably, this type of architectural buildings had been inherited by them from more ancient times. That times which were concerned of bloom of Hyperborea.
Possible presence of a part of Hyperborea on Moon allows to perceive much better the most complicated tectonic structure of the bed of Arctic ocean and to discover answers to many questions with which almost each explorer collides at trying to reconstruct
the history of evolution of this region. I never could get rid of the thought that in the stone chronicle (annals) of this part of the Earth the whole chapters were skipped. And just now it becomes clear for me where there can be their new storehouse.
Specialists on space geology can raise objections to me. Their arguments will be approximately the following. If Moon and was a part of the Earth its separation from it had occured still in Precambrian times. Otherwise it is impossible to explain the availability of such bulks of craters on it, on density of which the age of planets is usually determined. Besides, if Moon had been torn off from the Earth, it should melt completely at first and only then to gain the ball form.
Undoubtedly, it is so. But only in that case if the average probability of impact of planets with asteroids is taken into consideration and formation of celestial bodies from a gas-dust cloud is considered. And if under the influence of huge attractive force (gravitation) of the Earth existing at the initial stage of separation from it of a big piece, which afterwards became Moon, there was its partial melting, and large blocks of strongest rocks were remained on Moon which were retained on its surface like to block of ice on ocean surface or to orange peels in jam. And if
other numerous pieces collided with Moon, which have been torn off from the Earth together with it, and at first they were satellites of Moon, and fell (dropped) on its surface at reaching by them of the Roche limit, forming thus craters and new ridges which had partially sticked in a semiharden lunar crust. And if a part of lunar craters was formed on the Earth during wars between adityas with daityas and danavas and are the tracks from explosions of nuclear and other shells … And anything may else can be.
In a word, the determination of young elements of relief on Moon is very important argument in favour of its recent tearing
off from the Earth. And concentration of the major portion of "seas" on the part of Moon looking at the Earth as if confirms that development of Moon occured at first like development of the satellite of Jupiter Io when under influence of the strongest gravitation of the Earth looking at it rocks were melted in the first turn.

Middle Miocene Moon, should be, represented a surprising show. At first hardly raised over horizon and calling horror the igneous bubbling medley (mass), sparging melted stone drips in air and on land. Then standing low over horizon the fascinating glowing disk in several times exceeding the sun. In process of "rotation" ("run-up") of the Earth, it appeared in the sky more and more frequently, perhaps, in several hours after its setting for horizon.
It all the time seems to me standing in night silence, lighted by light of that supernatural moon, surprising gigantic multiarm and many-headed creatures which populated our planet in those far times. According to legends, many of them conducted a nocturnalism. And maybe, shining on the night sky even large, as well as they, the moon was the important element in their life. Perhaps, they prayed it. Probably, she added forces to them. Perhaps, she cloud their reason, and they became possessed and seized by unique desire to discover a victim to the night godhood.
Whether all it was really so, to establish difficultly enough. Though, in my opinion, creation of Moon in Middle Miocene and beginning its rotation (ran-up) explains very well appearence in our planet of rakshasas, nirritis, bhutas, pishschas, yakshas and other demonic beings which had gigantic sizes (more than 10 m). I passed an supposition earlier that the first signs of their presence on the Earth appeared in the end of Oligocene or Neogene but then my arguments were supported by nothing. Now they have received more powerful foundation.

© A.V. Koltypin, 2009

I, the author of this article A.Koltypin, permit to use it for any not prohibited by current legislation purposes on condition of indication of my authorship and a link to this site











Back to content | Back to main menu