The Earth before the Flood: Disappeared continents and civilizations

Here already several years I studiously (assiduously) sort out different types of people. After all, you see, and very similar, and absolutely unlike to each other individuals meet among us - both on appearance, and on character. Almost for certain, each of you at least once in your life met two absolutely identical person who never were in relationships with one another.

The basic distinctions between people

People differ from each other by many signs - height, constitution, length and width of arms and legs, a size and a form of hands, foots, fingers and toes, a volume and a morphology of a skull, a structure and a color of hair, a size and a profile of a nose, a size and contours of lips, a size and a colour of eyes, a tinge and a fabric of skin, a quantity of birthmarks, a volume of a chest, width of a waist, weight of bones. Some of them have soft and balanced character, others are hot-tempered and irritable at the slightest pretext. There are vegetarians among people who never use meat; there are also true "predators" for whom meat is main food. Communications with some people is given easily and simply, inflow of forces is felt. Meetings with other people, to the contrary, spoil mood for a long time.
People also differ among themselves on their mental and creative capacities, temperament, diligence, ratio to life of other creatures and by many other criterions. Meanwhile, it is possible seldom enough to find among them the "extremely left" and the "extremely right" individuals, at whom this or that sign is expressed in the maximum degree. There are much more often as though "middle" people at whom opposite signs are displayed in different degree.
I will illustrate it on examples. It is very difficult to find among us inherent vegetarians, there are no also and absolute "predators". The majority of people are combined such, apparently, incompatible qualities as kindness and cruelty, mildness and irascibility, frankness and insidiousness.

A man - whole, consisting of two opposite halves

Ancient teachings (doctrines) explain it by presence at each person of two opposite halves - one of them bears in itself kind, divine beginning, another - malicious, demonic. Progressing of any human person boils down to (comes to) continious struggle of two these "halves". In one events kind beginning dominates in people, in others - malicious one.
In my opinion, this is absolutely correct in the basis teaching which speaks that God, who created a man, and Demon, searching way to take possession of him (her), live in each of a person. Nevertheless, it does not explain all diversity of types of people and availability among them a large quantity of individuals, in equal degree kind and malicious, but having among themselves other differences visible by naked eyes (for example, colour of skin or of hair, height, weight, etc.)

Distinctions between people by zodiacal signs

People differ between themselves and by zodiacal signs. In 70-80 percents of cases it is possible unerring to distinguish on appearance and character Sagittarius (the Archer) from Gemini (the Twins), Aries (the Ram) from Pisces (the Fishes), Virgo from Libra (the Balance), etc. But this is also not settled diversity of people. People being inside of the twelve zodiacal groupes aren't always and not in all similar to each other.
Many their features, and absolutely different at that (height and constitution, length and a form of arms and legs, a volume of a chest and breadth of hips, a size and a form of eyes, predilection for vegetable or meat food, diligence or indolence, predilection to creative or engineering activity, ratio to life of other beings, etc.), cannot be explained only from positions of astrology and presence at each person of two opposite halves. They can not be also and the result of race belongings, because they are equally developed at representatives of different races and people.

Distinctions between people - the result of Great mixing between different nations, which had started long before appearence of a man

Only after analysis of many ancient texts and legends I have understood that the majority of distinctions between people, most likely, are the result of Great Mixing between nations (folks), started long before appearence of a man on the Earth, and continuing at the beginning of a human era.
I, of course, can make an error or be under impression of recently read literature, but I would like to explain presence on the Earth tall people, under two and more metres, by availability at them genes of space incomers - adityas, daityas or danavas. In inherent murderers I see genes of pishachas and nirritis. In vegetarians, apparently, genes of inhabitants of the "Golden Age", to which both dragon-people - nagas, viyevichs, uragas, and also adityas, gandharvas, apsaras and other reasonable beings belong, live till now . To the contrary, people who cannot do without meat even a day, most likely, are carriers of genes of yakshas, bhutas, pishachas and related to them nations.
Artistic and cheerful (joyous) girls and young men with blue or green eyes and gold-reddish hair with constitution of photomodels, in my opinion, have saved in themselves blood of gandharvas and apsaras which I have attributed to elves. Not great quantity of blood of gandharvas and apsaras, apparently, flows today and in veins of musicians, poets, artists and scientists. And here distant relatives of ploughers and farmers, most likely, were viyevichs, nagas and fomorians.
Lovers fascinating by their view and mistresses with snake features and also hypnotists, apparently, have in their line something from nagas. Passionate women with wide hips, large eyes and dark hair can be the distant descendants of yakshas.
People with mathematical and technical mentality, businessmen, atheists have all preconditions (backgrounds) to be continuers of a kin (family) of daityas and danavas. Having extrasensory capacity and clairvoyance persons, probably, have saved in themselves capacities of vidyadharas, charanas and siddhs.
The enumeration of similar analogies can be kept on long enough. But and mentioned examples are quite enough to perceive that in genealogical tree of a man practically all reasonable beings, having lived, on the Earth found their "niches". Whether they played an appreciable role in formation of human races? Most likely yes, only indirectly as I have told about it in the beginning. They have rendered much more powerful influence on types of people, regardless of their race.

© A.Koltypin, 2009

I, the author of this article A.Koltypin, permit to use it for any not prohibited by current legislation purposes on condition of indication of my authorship and a link to this site