Main menu:
Remnants of disappeared civilizations
Click photos!
One of the main "trump maps" of adherents of the theory of creation and evolution of a man from a monkey in the range of 5 - 2 million years ago is considered a lack of remnants of reasonable activity in rocks of more ancient age. Whether is it indeed?
I will give citations from works of scientists with a world name (after M. Cremo).
"Existence of a man in Oligocene … gets so strong and exact confirmation
that it will be hardly possibly for someone to find in it though any flaw …
We conflict with a serious problem - presence in Oligocene of beings enough
reasonable to make and use various types of tool". The saver of the Royal
museum of natural history in Bruxelles A.Rutot "Bulletin de la Societe Beige de
Geologic de Paleontologie et d'Hydrologie" (1907)
"Objections concerning a capability of presence of people in Pliocene and
Miocene, most likely, are related to theoretical conclusions, rather than with
direct observations ". The professor The Parisian museum of natural history,
the member of the French academy of Sciences Artman De Quatrefages. "Hommes
Fossiles et Hommes Sauvages "(1884)
"If to admit existence in any kind of people … in Carboniferous period it is
necessary to acknowledge geology not as a science, and as a solid charlatanism
and to force all geologists to re-train for drivers of trucks.… to acknowledge
these footprints are left by a man of Carboniferous period, means to agree
that twice two is seven, and ancient Shumerians flied on planes and also listened
Amos's revelations via radio". Geologist Albert G. Ingalls "Scientific American"
"An admission (acknowledgement) of belonging of sceletons from Kastenedolo
to Pliocene will put so many questions which do not have answers that we have
not to oscillate in a selection between adoption and denial of their authenticity ".
The professor R.A.S. Macalister. "Textbook of European Archeology "(1921)
"I would name by some kind of scientific superstition an inclination in force of
theoretical tendentiousness to deny any discoveries on that basis that they
confirm existence of a man in Tertiary (Paleogene and Neogene) Epochs.
It is necessary to save, at last, natural sciences from such prejudices ".
The professor of anatomy of Roman university G. Sergi. "Intorno al Fuomo
pliocenico in Italia"
As these citations demonstrate, judgements of scientists about finding of remnants of conscientious activity in Paleogene and Neogene sediments and a possibility of existence of reasonable inhabitants of the Earth in Cenozoic are essentially differed. If the explorers admitting an opportunity of existence of reasonable life during Tertiary period (66-2 million years ago) give for confirmation of their arguments discoveries of numerous remnants of conscientious activity in rocks of this age, that adherents of an origin of a man from a monkey in Pliocene epoch simply "close their eyes" and prefer not to notice all these finds. Many of them are possessed by emotions which not allow them to give credit for the given facts. As consequence of their position any finds contradicting an evolutionary theory, are considered as counterfeits - most often even without finding time by "fighters" for cleanness of a science to look at them. And if such finds rather come to be into their hands (for example, the skull of a dwarf representative of mankind Homo florensis, having age about 100 thousand years), they concentrate huge efforts (at the same time and money) on demonstrating that they are any unimaginable freak of nature or abnormality of evolution.
Unfortunately, the same takes place and in astronomy. According to the generally accepted theory of evolution and forming of stars the Sun in the course of its evolution will transform from a yellow dwarf what it is now, in a red giant. It is considered that as a result of this after 1-2 billion years life on the Earth will be impossible; the temperature on it will increase so that water of seas and oceans will evaporate and our planet will transform into lifeless wilderness. The positions of adherents of this theory are so strong that they do not notice (or try not to notice) many facts contradicting it - from notions of ancient people about evolution of the Solar system to recently obtained data about a composition of Mars and other planets and satellites of the Solar system which speaks that the Sun in the course of its evolution slowly cools down. In process of cooling of our celestial body life moves in the line to the planets, situated all closer and closer to the Sun ( read further...)
In the outstanding voluminous works (in my opinion, they should enter for a long time in a number of "canonical" ones in geologic colleges or universities) "Forbidden archeology" and "Unknown history of mankind" (nearby 900 and 600 pages each), Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson have shown on the basis of laborious learning of many years of geologic and archaeological records, scientific and popular scientific magazines, works and thesises of scientific conferences, newspapers and other materials from different archives and libraries that eoliths, palaeoliths and neoliths (in various degree treated and polished stones which used in the capacity of axes, knifes, scraper knifes, shovels, missile stones and others instruments) by age from 58 million up to 1,5 million years are discovered almost on all continents - in Europe, the North and the South America, Asia, Africa.
Together with them, in different places of the Earth more perfect articles (products) - bone instruments, holed and punctured bones, shells and spark tooth, carving on bones and shells, folds (paddocks) for animals, stone axes, knifes, tips of arrows, chisels, awls, grindstones, scrapers, millstones, flints for cutting of fire, mortars, pistils, and other articles have been found out. In some places near to these finds traces of ancient bonfire sites and charing bones of animals in them, human bones and pieces of skulls, partially or completely saved footprints of hominoids and bones with tips of arrows and spears in them have been found out.
The most amazing thing was that the most perfect finds made in gold-bearing sands of California and Southern Africa (different stone tools, mortars, pistils, bones and pieces of skulls of people or hominoids, similar to them), have been dated by Eocene - early Miocene (55-18 million years ago)! They were investigated by known geologists, they appeared in collections of scientific institutions and museums, and the facts of their discovery had been authenticated by notaries and attached by signatures of people which had found out them, given under oath. And only any time later, under pressure of not wishing to acknowledge these finds a scientific community (or of any other forces about possible existence of which I have already spoken) these finds completely disappeared, and memory of them was absolutely obliterated. Thus, on someone's obstinacy or intention (deliberate or iundeliberate, it is not so important) whole pages were torn out from the Book of history and these major (in million times more important, than tooth of Australopithecus) finds forever disappeared for mankind.
The material testimonies of existence in the past of high developed culture have been discovered in Scotland, England, France, the USA, Southern Africa and other countries. Their age changes in very wide limits - from Pliocene (2 million years ago) to Pre-Cambrian (600-700 million years ago). Such remnants include concrete walls with relief hieroglyphic images and without them, pieces of columns, glazed stone blocks and slabs with images, signs and letters engraved on them and without them, metallic hammers and mineralised (containing quartz and calcite crystals) handles, nails, coins, gold chains, clay statuettes, metallic balls with cuts (notchs), pipes, tankards, vases, footprints and other finds. Their larger part has been made in coal layers of different age.
Over the nineteenth century and in the beginning of the twentieth century scientists repeatedly found in Pleistocene and Pliocene sediments (from 110 thousand to 4 million years ago) of Europe (England, France and Italy) and America (Argentina, Brazil, the USA) skeleton remnants of hominoids with modern anatomic constitution - fully or partly saved sceletons, hips, ridges, other bones or splinters, pieces of skulls, jawsl and tooth. And from gold-bearing gravels of California and clay of Switzerland there were supposedly even pulled some sceletons, skulls and bones or hominoids almost not differing from the modern people the age was determined from 9 to 55 million years. And they were in beds in which perfect stone tools had been discovered too!
I recomend you to read in more details about all numbered above and many other finds in the M. Cremo and R. Thompson's mentione books, and also to visit M. Cremo site http://www.mcremo.com/
The other tweighty argument of opponents of existence of reasonable life in Cenozoic and more earlier time - in particular with accounting of my reconstructions according to which there were numerous highly-developed civilisations on the Earth at that time which built cities and roads, ploughed oceans, flied in air... - for certain, will be about the following one: "Well, let us assume, we are ready to admit trustworthiness of separate finds which could be and brought on the Earth by accidental aliens, but where in this case are ruins of ancient cities, abandoned technics, sceletons of people and all remaining beings which lived on the primitive Earth"
I suggest to read them my works:
" Great catastrophes in the history of the Earth",
" Why did so few remnants of highly developed civilizations save?"
and
" Mineral oil and gas - altered remnants of ancients".
In these works you will discover the comprehensive answer on these questions.
One more important argument of opponents of existence of reasonable life in Cenozoic and more earlier time can become the question: "If there existed highly-developed civilisations on the Earth why they have not exploited till now all minerals resources and did not use all resources of mineral oil and gas? Why we have not found out till now mine workings of the previous epoch?".
I admit fairly, the first question tormented also and me for a long enought time while I have not studied numerous legends which unambiguously speak that former "people" used an alternative energy which, if to speak very rough language or to do extremely careless transfer, they drawn from air. Even used by former inhabitants of the Earth nuclear weapon was not quite usual nuclear weapon because it was put in action by singing of hymns or reading of mantras, and the most trained warriors could stop its activity by means of the same method. On the same principle sorcery and magic were based, which were everyday occurrences in an antediluvian society, and in the beginning (during the "Golden Age") were used for the purposes of blessing of society, and then - for its destruction. And only gold, silver and jewels, judging by the same legends, were mined for a long time before Adam. Perhaps, for this reason they remains in a small quantities.
On the second question you will find the answer in the already mentioned work
" Why did so few remnants of highly developed civilizations save?"
There are also material, geologic, evidences of all just told. You can familiarize with them on the page " Drilling of ice in Antarctica and Greenland confirms existence of antediluvian civilisations"
In conclusion I would like to focus attention of a scientific public and, first of all, geologists on a very important problem - necessity of innovation in practice of geological investigations of a new methodology which should allow to confirm (or, to the contrary, to refute) existence of antediluvian civilisations. It should consist approximately in the following:
"How to confirm the existence of antediluvian civilisations? New research methods"